Section-aware extraction
It knows Section C from Section L from Section M, and treats them differently. Requirements, submission instructions and evaluation criteria come out separated rather than pooled.
GovBidAI reads the solicitation, extracts every requirement into a compliance matrix, and scores the opportunity against your actual capabilities — with the reasons written out, so you can argue with it.
$2,500 a pursuit, 48-hour rush available. If it doesn't save you twenty hours, you don't pay.
Compliance matrix
W912DR-26-R-0041 · Facility maintenance services
Pursue — with a teaming decision
Hard gate: Bonding capacity $5M required — your profile lists $3M
| ID | Requirement | Volume |
|---|---|---|
| L-3.2 | The offeror shall submit a Technical Volume not exceeding 40 pages. Section L, p. 62 | Technical |
| C-5.1 | The Contractor shall provide preventive maintenance on all HVAC units monthly. Section C, p. 18 | Technical |
| M-2.1 | Past performance will be evaluated on relevancy, recency and quality. Section M, p. 71 | Past performance |
| I-52.219-14 | Limitations on Subcontracting — incorporated by reference. Section I, p. 55 | Administrative |
Every row keeps its verbatim sentence and its page. Nothing enters the matrix paraphrased.
Every requirement, cited
Each row links to its section, page and the sentence it came from
Extraction is a first pass, not a filing. Every matrix is built to be reviewed.
GovBidAI is not a substitute for reading the solicitation. It finds requirements far faster than a person and misses fewer, but responsibility for responsiveness stays with you — which is why every row carries a citation you can check in seconds.
By the time anyone has read the whole thing carefully, half the response window is gone.
Solicitations are 200 pages of mostly boilerplate
The requirements that decide whether you're responsive are scattered across Sections C, L and M, in FAR clauses by reference, and in an amendment issued eleven days later.
One missed “shall” makes you non-responsive
Not out-scored — thrown out. Weeks of proposal work discarded because a submission requirement in Section L was never transferred into anyone's checklist.
You chase bids you were never going to win
Wrong NAICS, a set-aside you don't qualify for, a past-performance threshold you can't meet. The gates were knowable on day one, and nobody had time to check them.
Everything traceable to a page and a sentence. Nothing asserted without a citation.
It knows Section C from Section L from Section M, and treats them differently. Requirements, submission instructions and evaluation criteria come out separated rather than pooled.
Mandatory language is extracted verbatim with its section, page and sentence. Nothing is paraphrased into the matrix — a summarised requirement is a requirement you can't verify.
Requirement, source, volume, owner, status, page allocation. Exported to Excel with the formatting a proposal manager already expects.
A weighted score across fit, competition, capacity and value — with the inputs and weights visible, deterministic, and reproducible. If you disagree, you can see exactly which factor to argue with.
Set-aside eligibility, NAICS, clearance, bonding, mandatory certifications. Anything you categorically fail shows as a gate, not as a lower score — because those are no-bids, not weak bids.
When an amendment lands, the matrix diffs. Changed requirements, new requirements, moved dates — flagged rather than silently merged.
Forward it, we run it, you get the package. Usually inside 48 hours.
Forward the email, attach the PDF, or paste the SAM.gov link — with the response deadline if you have it. There is nothing to install and no account to create.
Section detection, every mandatory statement extracted with its page, referenced FAR and DFARS clauses resolved, scored against your capability profile. A person checks the low-confidence rows before anything leaves.
The compliance matrix in Excel, the bid/no-bid score with each factor written out, any hard gates called out separately, and a proposal outline. Then you decide — and if it did not save you twenty hours, there is no invoice.
A number nobody can interrogate gets ignored the second it disagrees with the room. So the scoring is deterministic, every factor's contribution is visible, and the weights are yours to change.
Same inputs, same score, every time. No model in the loop for the number itself — the model reads the document, the arithmetic does the scoring.
Capability fit, competition, capacity, contract value, past performance, incumbency. Each with its weight and its contribution shown, so a disagreement lands on a specific factor.
Anything you categorically fail is a gate, shown separately. A high score on a bid you're ineligible for is worse than no score at all.
Rescore an old opportunity and you get the same number, so a bid/no-bid decision made in March can still be explained in September.
Priced against the cost of one wasted pursuit, which is not close. A proposal consultant charges $5,000–$15,000 to reach the same decision.
$2,500 / solicitation
One solicitation, one complete decision package.
$4,000 / month
A shop with a live pipeline rather than one decision.
$25,000 / 90 days
A capture team, multiple business units, real controls.
If a package does not save you at least twenty hours on that pursuit, you do not pay — we invoice after you have seen it. One non-responsive submission costs more than a year of this.
Send us one you know well and check the matrix against what you found by hand. That comparison is the only demo worth doing — and it is the one we would rather you ran before you trust it with a pursuit you have not read yet.
Send us a solicitation$2,500 a pursuit. We invoice after you have seen it, and not at all if it did not save you twenty hours.